References

Anderson KJ, Lefever DG, Brinks J, Odde KG. The use of reproductive tract scoring in beef heifers. Agri-Practice. 1991; 12:19-26

Brito LFC, Barth AD, Rawlings NC Effect of improved nutrition during calfhood on serum metabolic hormones, gonadotropins, and testosterone concentrations, and on testicular development in bulls. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2007; 33:(4)460-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2006.09.004

Cushman RA, Kill LK, Funston RN, Mousel EM, Perry GA. Heifer calving date positively influences calf weaning weights through six parturitions1. J Anim Sci. 2013; 91:(9)4486-91 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-6465

Pelvic measurements for reducing calving difficulty. G87-895, Nebraska Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. 1987. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1321&context=extensionhist

Pre-Breeding Considerations for the Development of Replacement Beef Heifers. 2019. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/an329

Fortes MRS, Reverter A, Nagaraj SH A single nucleotide polymorphism-derived regulatory gene network underlying puberty in 2 tropical breeds of beef cattle1. J Anim Sci. 2011; 89:(6)1669-83 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3681

Garverick AH, Smith MF. Female reproductive physiology and endocrinology of cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1993; 9:(2)223-47 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30643-5

Gasser CL. Joint alpharma-beef species symposium: considerations on puberty in replacement beef heifers1. J Anim Sci. 2013; 91:(3)1336-40 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-6008

Holm DE, Thompson PN, Irons PC. The value of reproductive tract scoring as a predictor of fertility and production outcomes in beef heifers1. J Anim Sci. 2009; 87:(6)1934-40 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1579

Holm DE, Nielen M, Jorritsma R, Irons PC, Thompson PN. Ultrasonographic reproductive tract measures and pelvis measures as predictors of pregnancy failure and anestrus in restricted bred beef heifers. Theriogenology. 2016; 85:(3)495-501 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.09.031

Honaramooz A, Aravindakshan J, Chandolia RK Ultrasonographic evaluation of the pre-pubertal development of the reproductive tract in beef heifers. Anim Reprod Sci. 2004; 80:(1-2)15-29 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00136-2

Ireland JJ, Smith GW, Scheetz D Does size matter in females? An overview of the impact of the high variation in the ovarian reserve on ovarian function and fertility, utility of anti-Müllerian hormone as a diagnostic marker for fertility and causes of variation in the ovarian reserve in cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2011; 23:(1)1-14 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD10226

Johnson SK, Deutscher GH, Parkhurst A. Relationships of Pelvic Structure, Body Measurements, Pelvic Area and Calving Difficulty. J Animal Sci. 1988; 66:1081-1088 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1988.6651081x

Kleiber M. Reviews 1947. Physiol Rev. 1947; 27:511-41 https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1947.27.4.511

Pre-Breeding Examination of Beef Heifers. Kansas State University, 1–7. 1990. https://www.wcabp.com/images/pdfs/conference2017/B05_-_LARSON_Robert.pdf (accessed 4th August 2020)

Instructions for Rice Pelvimeter. The Rice Pelvimeter Manual, 4. 1997. http://www.lane-mfg.com/Rice%20Pelvimeter%20Instructions.pdf (accessed 4th August 2020)

McNeel AK, Cushman RA. Influence of puberty and antral follicle count on calving day in crossbred beef heifers. Theriogenology. 2015; 84:(7)1061-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.06.010

Mee JF. Managing the dairy cow at calving time. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2004; 20:(3)521-46 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2004.06.001

Morotti F, Zangirolamo AF, Silva NC, Silva CB, Rosa CO, Seneda MM. Antral follicle count in cattle: advantages, challenges, and controversy. Anim Reprod. 2017; 14:(3)514-20 https://doi.org/10.21451/1984-3143-AR994

Mossa F, Walsh SW, Butler ST Low numbers of ovarian follicles ≥3 mm in diameter are associated with low fertility in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2012; 95:(5)2355-61 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4325

Murray A. Replacement heifers.: Teagasc, Agriculture and Food Development Authority; 2005

NFU. Achieving net zero-meeting the climate change challenge. Policy statement. 2019. https://www.nfuonline.com/cross-sector/environment/climate-change/climate-change-news/net-zero-agriculture/ (accessed 4th August 2020)

Norman HD, Hutchison JL, Miller RH. Use of sexed semen and its effect on conception rate, calf sex, dystocia, and stillbirth of Holsteins in the United States. J Dairy Sci. 2010; 93:(8)3880-90 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2781

Patterson DSR Communication of the use of synchronisation in beef herds at the Zoetis Fertility Workshops with Professor David Patterson. An update on beef fertility improvements and how to engage with your farmers.: University of Missouri; 2017

Clinical Use of Reproductive Tract Scoring to Predict Pregnancy Outcome 1999 Beef Research Report — Iowa State University. 1999. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/38890019.pdf (accessed 4th August 2020)

Pence M, Ensley D, Berghaus R, Rossi J, Wilson T, Cannon PT. Improving reproductive efficiency through the use of reproductive tract scoring in a group of beef replacement heifers. Bov Pract. 2007; 41:35-40

Breeding soundness examination for replacement heifers. 2015. https://www.aces.edu/blog/topics/beef/breeding-soundness-examination-for-replacement-heifers/

Rosenkrans KS, Hardin DK. Repeatability and accuracy of reproductive tract scoring to determine pubertal status in beef heifers. Theriogenology. 2003; 59:(5-6)1087-92 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01171-8

Santa Cruz R, Cushman RA, Viñoles C. Antral follicular count is a tool that may allow the selection of more precocious Bradford heifers at weaning. Theriogenology. 2018; 119:35-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.06.010

Stevenson J. Clinical Reproductive Physiology of the Cow, 2nd Edition. In: Youngquist RS, Threlfall WR (eds). : Elsevier; 2007

Summers AF, Rosasco SL, Scholljegerdes EJ. Beef species-ruminant nutrition cactus beef symposium: Influence of management decisions during heifer development on enhancing reproductive success and cow longevity 1. J Animal Sci. 2019; 97:(3)1407-14 https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky440

Teagasc. The Beef Carbon Navigator. 2019. https://www.teagasc.ie/publications/2019/the-beef-carbon-navigator.php (accessed 19th June, 2020)

Tenhagen BA, Helmbold A, Heuwieser W. Effect of various degrees of dystocia in dairy cattle on calf viability, milk production, fertility and culling. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A. 2007; 54:(2)98-102 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.2007.00850.x

Toro CA, Aylwin CF, Lomniczi A. Hypothalamic epigenetics driving female puberty. J of neuroendocrinol. 2018; 30:(7) https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.12589

Pelvic Area Measurements in the Management of Replacement Heifers. Agriculture and Natural Resources. 2011. http://www.uaex.edu

Wathes DC, Pollott GE, Johnson KF, Richardson H, Cooke JS. Heifer fertility and carry over consequences for life time production in dairy and beef cattle. Animal. 2014; 8:(s1)91-104 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000755

Pre-breeding heifer examination and selection in UK beef herds

02 September 2020
13 mins read
Volume 25 · Issue 5
Figure 4. Measuring the internal pelvic width with the Rice pelvimeter, with the measurement taken from the level of the poas tubercles to measure the widest point of the pelvis.
Figure 4. Measuring the internal pelvic width with the Rice pelvimeter, with the measurement taken from the level of the poas tubercles to measure the widest point of the pelvis.

Abstract

The objective of this review is to evaluate examination tools and how they can be used to assess the breeding potential of beef heifers prior to service. Reproductive tract examination techniques, pelvic measurement, and antral follicle counts (AFC) are methods that are used and could be of value to farmers where they can either identify pubescent heifers and/or those with the best reproductive potential. Reproductive tract scoring (RTS) to assess the pubertal state and therefore reproductive status of replacement heifers is explored alongside further adaptions of this method. The use of pelvic measurement is considered: first, where a small pelvic area or an abnormal shaped pelvic inlet is identified, which may result in elimination from the breeding cohort to reduce the potential risk of dystocia and poor performance; and second, since it may be advocated for use in conjunction with other methods. AFC are included since they too may help identify the reproductive potential of heifers. Evaluation of these examination tools demonstrates that the use of modified RTS methods, to include ultrasound examination to detect the absence of a corpus luteum (CL), absence of a follicle ≥ 13 mm and the uterine horn diameter as well as pelvic measurements, could add value to heifer breeding soundness examinations (HBSE) when carried out.

It is widely recognised that bull breeding soundness examination should play a routine role in herd health preparation ahead of the service period. However, routine breeding soundness examination of eligible reproductive females is not commonplace in most UK beef herds. The future health, welfare, productivity and sustainability of the herd is reliant on selecting the most fertile, efficient and suitably sized replacement stock for breeding. Routine practices such as infectious disease monitoring, trace element and metabolic blood profiles, vaccination and nutritional management are key to maintaining a healthy, fertile herd. Breeding decisions are oft en based on important subjective measures such as docility, conformation, external frame, and selection of heifers from the best cows, alongside simple and traditional, objective selection targets such as age and weight at first service. Tools such as reproductive tract examination and pelvic measurements have been developed and adapted, and while they may require more time and skill to implement, they could still have a place in pre-breeding examinations. Reproductive tract scoring (RTS), however, was found to be a better predictor of reproductive performance compared with previously advocated measurements of bodyweight, body condition score (BCS) and the older Kleiber Ratio (Kleiber, 1947; Holm et al, 2009). Improved reproductive tract measurements (Holm et al, 2016) and objective pelvic measurement have been shown to add prognostic value for pregnancy failure and prognostic value for poor performing heifers respectively (Holm et al, 2016).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.