References

Bolt SL, George AJ. The use of environmental enrichment on farms benefits animal welfare and productivity. Livestock (Lond). 2019; 24:(4)183-188 https://doi.org/10.12968/live.2019.24.4.183

The influence of social networks on welfare and productivity in dairy cattle. 2015. https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/19360/BoylandN.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Boyland NK, James R, Mlynski DT, Madden JR, Croft DP. Spatial proximity loggers for recording animal social networks: consequences of inter-logger variation in performance. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2013; 67:(11)1877-1890 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1622-6

Boyland NK, Mlynski DT, James R, Brent LJN, Croft DP. The social network structure of a dynamic group of dairy cows: from individual to group level patterns. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2016; 174:1-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.11.016

Büttner K, Czycholl I, Mees K, Krieter J. Temporal development of agonistic interactions as well as dominance indices and centrality parameters in pigs after mixing. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2020; 222 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104913

Chebel RC, Silva PRB, Endres MI, Ballou MA, Luchterhand KL. Social stressors and their effects on immunity and health of periparturient dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2016; 99:(4)3217-3228 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10369

Croft DP, James R, Krause J. Exploring Animal Social Networks.: Princeton University Press; 2008

Croft DP, Darden SK, Wey TW. Current directions in animal social networks. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016; 12:52-58 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.09.001

de Freslon I, Martínez-López B, Belkhiria J, Strappini A, Monti G. Use of social network analysis to improve the understanding of social behaviour in dairy cattle and its impact on disease transmission. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2019; 213:47-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.01.006

Foris B, Zebunke M, Langbein J, Melzer N. Comprehensive analysis of affiliative and agonistic social networks in lactating dairy cattle groups. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2019; 210:60-67 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2018.10.016

Fregonesi JA, Leaver JD. Behaviour, performance and health indicators of welfare for dairy cows housed in strawyard or cubicle systems. Livest Prod Sci. 2001; 68:(2-3)205-216 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00234-7

Gygax L, Neisen G, Wechsler B. Socio-Spatial Relationships in Dairy Cows. Ethology. 2010; 116:(1)10-23 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01708.x

James R, Croft DP, Krause J. Potential banana skins in animal social network analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2009; 63:(7)989-997 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0742-5

Krause J, Croft DP, James R. Social network theory in the behavioural sciences: potential applications. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2007; 62:(1)15-27 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0445-8

Lewton J, Rose PE. Evaluating the social structure of captive Rothschild's giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis rothschildi): relevance to animal management and animal welfare. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2020; 23:(2)178-192 https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2019.1573682

Makagon MM, McCowan B, Mench JA. How can social network analysis contribute to social behavior research in applied ethology?. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2012; 138:(3-4)152-161 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.02.003

Martínez-López B, Perez AM, Sánchez-Vizcaíno JM. Social network analysis. Review of general concepts and use in preventive veterinary medicine. 2009; 56:(4)109-120 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1865-1682.2009.01073.x

Meise K, Franks DW, Bro-Jørgensen J. Using social network analysis of mixed-species groups in African savannah herbivores to assess how community structure responds to environmental change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2019; 374:(1781)

Myers JP. Space, time and the pattern of individual associations in a group-living species: sanderlings have no friends. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1983; 12:(2)129-134 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00343203

Neethirajan S. Recent advances in wearable sensors for animal health management. Sens Biosensing Res. 2017; 12:15-29 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsr.2016.11.004

Neisen G, Wechsler B, Gygax L. Relationship of social rank and proximity in dairy cows kept in cubicle housing systems. KTBL-Schrift. 2007; 461:66-75

Pfeiffer CN, Firestone SM, Campbell AJD, Larsen JWA, Stevenson MA. Sample size considerations for livestock movement network data. Prev Vet Med. 2015; 122:(4)399-405 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.07.009

Rocha LEC, Terenius O, Veissier I, Meunier B, Nielsen PP. Persistence of sociality in group dynamics of dairy cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2020; 223 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104921

Rose PE, Croft DP. Social bonds in a flock bird: species differences and seasonality in social structure in captive flamingo flocks over a 12-month period. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2017; 193:87-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.03.006

Sueur C, Jacobs A, Amblard F, Petit O, King AJ. How can social network analysis improve the study of primate behavior?. Am J Primatol. 2011; 73:(8)703-719 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20915

Vimalajeewa D, Balasubramaniam S, O'Brien B, Kulatunga C, Berry DP. Leveraging social network analysis for characterizing cohesion of human-managed animals. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems. 2019; 6:(2)323-337 https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2019.2902456

Wey T, Blumstein DT, Shen W, Jordán F. Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Anim Behav. 2008; 75:(2)333-344 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.06.020

Whitehead H. Analyzing animal societies: quantitative methods for vertebrate social analysis.: University of Chicago Press; 2008

Whitehead H. SOCPROG programs: analysing animal social structures. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2009; 63:(5)765-778 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0697-y

Understanding the social behaviour of dairy cattle can benefit welfare and productivity

02 September 2020
8 mins read
Volume 25 · Issue 5
Figure 3. Example of additional outside space for dairy cattle.
Figure 3. Example of additional outside space for dairy cattle.

Abstract

Cattle are social animals, and an understanding of social associations and interactions is an important consideration when managing herds. Knowledge of this can facilitate positive welfare and productivity and it can also help to reduce the spread of disease. Social network analysis (SNA) is a tool that can be used to assess specific social interactions within cattle groups and help determine appropriate management actions in livestock enterprises. The aim of this review is to summarise how SNA can be used to study the social behaviour patterns of dairy cattle and highlight applications for this approach on dairy farms.

Many species of animal live in social groups, where complex relationships and structures form (Wey et al, 2008; Sueur et al, 2011). These social structures are an important attribute of an animal population (Whitehead, 2009), and the association patterns that occur will influence behavioural characteristics within social systems (Myers, 1983). Benefits of familiarity are gained from an individual's prior knowledge of a conspecific's behaviour, and in many social species it has been found that association patterns are non-random (Sueur et al, 2011), which suggests that animals generally prefer to associate with certain individuals.

The aim of this review is to summarise research based on how a tool called social network analysis (SNA) can be used to study the social behaviour patterns of dairy cattle. Applications based on the findings of such research are also discussed to facilitate enhanced management of dairy cattle, which can lead to increased welfare and productivity.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.