References
Diagnostic testing in small ruminant medicine

Abstract
Diagnostic testing can be a challenging, although very rewarding component of veterinary medicine, which, if carried out with a systematic approach and taking into consideration both history taking/data collection and clinical examination, can enhance the clinician's ability to confidently reach a diagnosis, apply the appropriate changes and/or control measures and, in the end, provide cost-effective benefits to the overall health and management of small ruminants. Many diagnostics tests are available for small ruminants, and the difficulty is to know which are the most appropriate for the disease/condition in questions, taking into consideration economic factors, the performance of the test(s) and the sampling methodology. Finally, new technologies have arisen in the last few years, which will be of particular interest to overcome some of the challenges in small ruminant diagnostics.
Disease diagnosis is a complex process, similar to hypothesis testing. Diagnostic tests should be considered ancillary measures, meaning they should complement a thorough process which culminates with a diagnosis, and includes a thorough history taking and/or proper data collection combined with, where necessary, clinical examination (Figure 1). These underlying steps will allow the clinician to formulate a comprehensive, yet relevant, list of differential diagnoses; diagnostic testing is then applied in a systematic, logical method to assess the list of differential diagnoses and confirm or exclude each possibility. Most importantly, diagnostic tests should not be used to stumble upon a diagnosis, but as a supportive tool in the decision-making process.
The fundamental, underlying question is, why do we need to perform diagnostic tests? The first reason will often be to confirm a clinical suspicion, either for personal interest or to apply the appropriate treatment and/or control measures. The classic example here is the development of anthelmintic resistance (Figure 2a); a very relevant topic in small ruminant medicine, where specific, updated guidelines are now available to guide diagnosis, providing reliable information for the selection of the appropriate anthelmintic class to use (Kaplan et al, 2023). The same applies in case of changes in routine management procedures or the application of preventive measures, where advice should be based on evidence of disease or on baseline measures to assess the impact of the proposed changes. For example, there are many vaccines available for small ruminants (Lacasta et al, 2015), therefore knowing which diseases are present on farm (or which have the highest impact), will be fundamental in selecting the most relevant vaccines to include in health management plans (Figure 2b). Finally, it is important to remember that, by submitting diagnostic samples to official laboratories (Figure 2c), clinicians can contribute to passive surveillance, providing data for monitoring of endemic diseases, as well as early detection of outbreaks and unknown diseases (Dijkstra et al, 2022).
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.