References

Epidemiology of lameness in dairy cows. 2007. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.487362

Bell NJ. The alleviation and prevention of lameness in dairy heifers.: University of Bristol; 2006

Bell J. Identifying infection reservoirs of digital dermatitis in dairy cattle.: University of Liverpool; 2017

Bell N, Mahendran S. Local anaesthesia and analgesia guidance for surgical treatment of cows with necrotic hoof lesions. Livestock. 2017; 22:(6)298-304 https://doi.org/10.12968/live.2017.22.6.298

Bell NJ, Main DCJ. Case report: reducing lameness through active screening, attention to details and skilled staff. Livestock. 2012; 17:(1)14-19 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-3870.2011.00090.x

Bell N, Vanhoudt A. Treating and controlling digital dermatitis in dairy cattle. In Pract. 2020; 42:(10)554-567 https://doi.org/10.1136/inp.m4454

Bell NJ, Potterton S, Blowey R Disinfectant footbathing agents for the control of bovine digital dermatitis in dairy cattle. Livestock. 2014; 19:(1)6-13 https://doi.org/10.12968/live.2014.19.1.6

Bergsten C, Greenough PR, Gay JM, Seymour WM, Gay CC. Effects of biotin supple-mentation on performance and claw lesions on a commercial dairy farm. J Dairy Sci. 2003; 86:(12)3953-3962 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74005-3

Berry SL, Read DH, Walker RL, Famula TR. Clinical, histologic, and bacteriologic findings in dairy cows with digital dermatitis (footwarts) one month after topical treatment with lincomycin hydrochloride or oxytetracycline hydrochloride. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010; 237:(5)555-560 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.237.5.555

Berry SL, Read DH, Famula TR, Mongini A, Döpfer D. Long-term observations on the dynamics of bovine digital dermatitis lesions on a California dairy after topical treatment with lincomycin HCl. Vet J. 2012; 193:(3)654-658 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.048

Blowey R, Sharp M. Digital dermatitis in dairy cattle. Vet Rec. 1988; 122:(21)505-508 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.122.21.505

Clegg SR, Bell J, Ainsworth S, Blowey RW, Bell NJ, Carter SD, Evans NJ. Isolation of digital dermatitis treponemes from cattle hock skin lesions. Vet Dermatol. 2016a; 27:(2)106-e30 https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.12286

Clegg SR, Carter SD, Stewart JP, Amin DM, Blowey RW, Evans NJ. Isolation of treponemes from ischaemic teat necrosis in cattle. Vet Rec. 2016b; 178:(3) https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.103167

Cook NB, Rieman J, Gomez A, Burgi K. Observations on the design and use of footbaths for the control of infectious hoof disease in dairy cattle. Vet J. 2012; 193:(3)669-673 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.051

Cramer G, Solano L, Johnson R. Evaluation of tetracycline in milk following extralabel administration of topical tetracycline for digital dermatitis in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2019; 102:(1)883-895 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14961

Cutler JH, Cramer G, Walter JJ, Millman ST, Kelton DF. Randomized clinical trial of tetracycline hydrochloride bandage and paste treatments for resolution of lesions and pain associated with digital dermatitis in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2013; 96:(12)7550-7 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6384

Dolecheck KA, Overton MW, Mark TB, Bewley JM. Use of a stochastic simulation model to estimate the cost per case of digital dermatitis, sole ulcer, and white line disease by parity group and incidence timing. J Dairy Sci. 2019; 102:(1)715-730 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14901

Döpfer D, ter Huurne AAHM, Cornelisse JL Histological and bacteriological evaluation of digital dermatitis in cattle, with special reference to spirochaetes and Campylobacter faecalis. Vet Rec. 1997; 140:(24)620-623 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.140.24.620

Dotinga A, Jorritsma R, Nielen M. A randomised non-inferiority trial on the effect of an antibiotic or non-antibiotic topical treatment protocol for digital dermatitis in dairy cattle. Vet Evid. 2017; 2:(4)1-13 https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v2i4.111

Duncan JS, Angell JW, Carter SD, Evans NJ, Sullivan LE, Grove-White DH. Contagious ovine digital dermatitis: an emerging disease. Vet J. 2014; 201:(3)265-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.06.007

Evans NJ, Brown JM, Demirkan I Three unique groups of spirochetes isolated from digital dermatitis lesions in UK cattle. Vet Microbiol. 2008; 130:(1-2)141-150 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.12.019

Evans NJ, Brown JM, Demirkan I Treponema pedis sp. nov., a spirochaete isolated from bovine digital dermatitis lesions. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009a; 59:(5)987-991 https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.002287-0

Evans NJ, Brown JM, Demirkan I Association of unique, isolated treponemes with bovine digital dermatitis lesions.: Medline; 2009b https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01914-08

Evans NJ, Timofte D, Carter SD Association of treponemes with bovine ulcerative mammary dermatitis. Vet Rec. 2010; 166:(17)532-533 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.b4822

Evans NJ, Blowey RW, Timofte D Association between bovine digital dermatitis treponemes and a range of ‘non-healing’ bovine hoof disorders. Vet Rec. 2011; 168:(8) https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.c5487

Evans NJ, Brown JM, Hartley C, Smith RF, Carter SD. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bovine digital dermatitis treponemes identifies macrolides for in vivo efficacy testing. Vet Microbiol. 2012; 160:(3-4)496-500 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.06.001

Fiedler A, Sauter-Louis C, Maierl J. Polyurethane dressing, tetracycline and salicylic acid use for treatment of digital dermatitis in cattle: A comparative study. Tierarztl Prax Ausgabe G Grosstiere - Nutztiere. 2015; 43:(6)350-358 https://doi.org/10.15653/TPG-140751

Gillespie A, Carter SD, Blowey RW, Evans N. Survival of bovine digital dermatitis treponemes on hoof knife blades and the effects of various disinfectants. Vet Rec. 2020; 186:(2) https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105406

Gomez A, Cook NB, Bernardoni ND An experimental infection model to induce digital dermatitis infection in cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2012; 95:(4)1821-1830 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4754

Gomez A, Cook NB, Socha MT, Döpfer D. First-lactation performance in cows affected by digital dermatitis during the rearing period. J Dairy Sci. 2015; 98:(7)4487-4498 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-9041

Hartshorn RE, Thomas EC, Anklam K Short communication: minimum bactericidal concentration of disinfectants evaluated for bovine digital dermatitis-associated Treponema phagedenis-like spirochetes. J Dairy Sci. 2013; 96:(5)3034-3038 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5994

Holzhauer M, Bartels CJ, van Barneveld M, Vulders C, Lam T. Curative effect of topical treatment of digital dermatitis with a gel containing activated copper and zinc chelate. Vet Rec. 2011; 169:(21) https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.d5513

Holzhauer M, Ploegmakers-van Deventer R, Smits D, Swart W. Comparing the curative efficacy of topical treatment with thiamphenicol and oxytetracycline on digital dermatitis lesions in dairy cattle. Vet Rec. 2017; 180:(20) https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.103758

Kasiora K, Anagnostopoulos A, Bedford C Evaluation of the use of ketoprofen for the treatment of digital dermatitis in dairy cattle: A randomised, positive controlled, clinical trial. Vet Rec. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.977

Klawitter M, Döpfer D, Braden TB, Amene E, Mueller KE. Randomised clinical trial showing the curative effect of bandaging on M2-stage lesions of digital dermatitis in dairy cows. Vet Rec Open. 2019; 6:(1) https://doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2017-000264

ICAR Claw Health Atlas - Annex 1. Digital Dermatitis Stages (M-stages). 2020. https://www.icar.org/ICAR-Claw-Health-Atlas-Appendix-1-DD-stages-M-stages.pdf

Krull AC, Shearer JK, Gorden PJ, Cooper VL, Phillips GJ, Plummer PJ. Deep sequencing analysis reveals temporal microbiota changes associated with development of bovine digital dermatitis. Infect Immun. 2014; 82:(8)3359-3373 https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.02077-14

Krull AC, Cooper VL, Coatney JW, Shearer JK, Gorden PJ, Plummer PJ. A Highly Effective Protocol for the Rapid and Consistent Induction of Digital Dermatitis in Holstein Calves. PLoS One. 2016a; 11:(4) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154481

Digital dermatitis: natural lesion progression and regression in Holstein dairy cattle over 3 years. 2016b. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002203021600179X

Laven RA, Hunt H. Evaluation of copper sulphate, formalin and peracetic acid in footbaths for the treatment of digital dermatitis in cattle. Vet Rec. 2002; 151:(5)144-146 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.151.5.144

Laven RA, Logue DN. Treatment strategies for digital dermatitis for the UK. Vet J. 2006; 171:(1)79-88 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.08.009

Murray RD, Downham DY, Clarkson MJ Epidemiology of lameness in dairy cattle: description and analysis of foot lesions. Vet Rec. 1996; 138:(24)586-591 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.138.24.586

Antimicrobials in Agriculture and the Environment: Reducing Unnecessary Use and Waste. 2015. https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/Antimicrobials%20in%20agriculture%20and%20the%20environment%20-%20Reducing%20unnecessary%20use%20and%20waste.pdf (accessed 22 February 2022)

Pedersen S. Digital dermatitis control in the dairy herd: incorporating the ‘blitz’ treatment approach. Livestock. 2019; 24:(3)130-135 https://doi.org/10.12968/live.2019.24.3.130

Potterton SL, Bell NJ, Whay HR A descriptive review of the peer and non-peer reviewed literature on the treatment and prevention of foot lameness in cattle published between 2000 and 2011. Vet J. 2012; 193:(3)612-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.040

Read DH, Walker RL. Papillomatous digital dermatitis (footwarts) in California dairy cattle: clinical and gross pathologic findings. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1998; 10:(1)67-76 https://doi.org/10.1177/104063879801000112

Relun A, Lehebel A, Bruggink M, Bareille N, Guatteo R. Estimation of the relative impact of treatment and herd management practices on prevention of digital dermatitis in French dairy herds. Prev Vet Med. 2013; 110:(3-4)558-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.12.015

Rodriguez-Lainz A, Melendez-Retamal P, Hird DW, Read DH. Papillomatous digital dermatitis in Chilean dairies and evaluation of a screening method. Prev Vet Med. 1998; 37:(1-4)197-207 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(98)00091-9

Schultz N, Capion N. Efficacy of salicylic acid in the treatment of digital dermatitis in dairy cattle. Vet J. 2013; 198:(2)518-523 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.09.002

Silva LAF, Silva CA, Borges JRJ, Fioravanti MC, Borges GT, Atayde IB. A clinical trial to assess the use of sodium hypochlorite and oxytetracycline on the healing of digital dermatitis lesions in cattle. Can Vet J. 2005; 46:(4)345-348

Stokes JE. Investigating novel and existing methods of preventing, detecting and treating digital dermatitis in dairy cows.Bristol2011

Sullivan LE, Blowey RW, Carter SD Presence of digital dermatitis treponemes on cattle and sheep hoof trimming equipment. Vet Rec. 2014; 175:(8) https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.102269

Sullivan LE, Evans NJ, Blowey RW A molecular epidemiology of treponemes in beef cattle digital dermatitis lesions and comparative analyses with sheep contagious ovine digital dermatitis and dairy cattle digital dermatitis lesions. Vet Microbiol. 2015; 178:(1-2)77-87 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.04.011

Vink WD. Investigating the epidemiology of Bovine Digital Dermatitis: causality, transmission and infection dynamics.: University of Liverpool; 2006

Watts KM, Lahiri P, Arrazuria R Oxytetracycline reduces inflammation and treponeme burden whereas vitamin D3 promotes β-defensin expression in bovine infectious digital dermatitis. Cell Tissue Res. 2020; 379:(2)337-348 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-019-03082-y

Whay HR, Webster AJF, Waterman-Pearson AE. Role of ketoprofen in the modulation of hyperalgesia associated with lameness in dairy cattle. Vet Rec. 2005; 157:(23)729-733 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.157.23.729

Willshire JA, Bell NJ. An economic review of cattle lameness. Cattle Pract. 2009; 17:(2)136-141

Zinicola M, Higgins H, Lima S, Machado V, Guard C, Bicalho R. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing reveals functional genes and microbiome associated with bovine digital dermatitis. PLoS One. 2015; 10:(7) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133674

Latest concepts relevant to treatment of digital dermatitis in dairy cattle

02 March 2022
15 mins read
Volume 27 · Issue 2

Abstract

Digital dermatitis is one of the most common lesions causing lameness in dairy cattle, also affecting beef cattle and sheep. It is a highly infectious polymicrobial infection, with several species of treponeme implicated. Many treatments appear efficacious and given the animal appears the main reservoir of infection, there are strong arguments for proactive targeted treatment of cows with lesions leading to improved welfare, production and disease control. This article explores the antibacterial treatment options for digital dermatitis and some adjunctive therapies that can improve cure rates. Licensed topical antibiotics generally achieve a good outcome, but non-antibiotic alternatives may be preferable for ethical reasons and for chronic or mild lesions. There is a strong rationale for providing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to reduce pain and inflammation associated with infections. Optimal bandaging technique is still poorly understood and despite the evidence, opinion remains deeply divided on their use.

Digital dermatitis is a common lesion causing lameness in dairy cattle (Barker, 2007), but also affects beef cattle (Sullivan et al, 2015) and sheep (Duncan et al, 2014). The average prevalence of digital dermatitis in dairy cattle can exceed 30% (Bell, 2006; Vink, 2006; Stokes, 2011), with a significant seasonality largely influenced by winter housing risks (Bell, 2006; Stokes, 2011). While many lesions do not cause clinical lameness (Stokes, 2011), volatility in herd mobility scores can often be attributed to repeated breakdowns in control of digital dermatitis (Bell and Main, 2012).

Digital dermatitis is a costly disease, leading to milk yield loss (Relun et al, 2013; Gomez et al, 2015; Kasiora et al, 2021) and reduced fertility (Gomez et al, 2015). While some cows with necrotic hoof lesions become chronically lame leading to culling, there are no reports of increased culling of cows with classic digital dermatitis lesions on the heels. Stochastic modelling would indicate the cost per case could be $64 USD (Dolecheck et al, 2019), although other studies have reported higher figures with UK conditions (Willshire and Bell, 2009).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.