References

Bennett R. The ‘Direct Costs'of Livestock Disease: The Development of a System of Models for the Analysis of 30 Endemic Livestock Diseases in Great Britain. J Agric Econ. 2003; 54:(1)55-71 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2003.tb00048.x

Booth RE, Brownlie J. Establishing a pilot bovine viral diarrhoea virus eradication scheme in Somerset. Vet Rec. 2012; 170:(3) https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.100191

Booth RE, Brownlie J. Comparison of bulk milk antibody and youngstock serology screens for determining herd status for Bovine Viral Diarrhoea Virus. BMC Vet Res. 2016; 12:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0797-2

BVDFree. BVDFree. 2018. www.bvdfree.org.uk (accessed 15 September 2020)

BVDzero Congress. National BVD survey 2019. http://www.bvdzero.co.uk/sites/default/files/bvd_survey_2019_responses.pdf (accessed 10 November, 2020)

CHeCS. CHeCS Technical Document. 2019. https://www.checs.co.uk/ (accessed 15 September 2020)

Evans CA, Pinior B, Larska M, Graham D, Schweizer M, Guidarini C, Decaro N, Ridpath J, Gates MC. Global knowledge gaps in the prevention and control of bovine viral diarrhoea (BVD) virus. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019; 66:(2)640-652 https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13068

Lanyon SR, Hill FI, Reichel MP, Brownlie J. Bovine viral diarrhoea: pathogenesis and diagnosis. Vet J. 2014; 199:(2)201-209 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.07.024

Larghi M. Comparative study in the control of bovine viral diarrhea. Anim Health Res Rev. 2018; 19:(2)125-133 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252318000129

Meadows D. A Study to investigate the use and application of BVDV vaccine in UK Cattle. Cattle Pract. 2010; 18:(3)

Nettleton PF, Entrican G. Ruminant pestiviruses. Br Vet J. 1995; 151:(6)615-642 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1935(95)80145-6

Red Tractor. Changes to Dairy Standards version 4.1. 2019. https://assurance.redtractor.org.uk/contentfiles/Farmers-7032.pdf?_=637007928013074058 (accessed 15 September 2020)

Small S, Cresswell L, Lovatt F Do UK sheep farmers use of vaccine correctly and could their vaccination strategy affect vaccine efficacy?. Vet Rec. 2019; 185:(10) https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105472

Waters A. Consistent approach needed to tackle BVD. Vet Rec. 2019; 185:(3) https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.l4751

Yarnall MJ, Thrusfield MV. Engaging veterinarians and farmers in eradicating bovine viral diarrhoea: a systematic review of economic impact. Vet Rec. 2017; 181:(13) https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.104370

Managing BVDV at the herd level part 1

02 November 2020
13 mins read
Volume 25 · Issue 6
Figure 4. Example illustration from the author's bovine viral diarrhoea virus teaching for farmers.
Figure 4. Example illustration from the author's bovine viral diarrhoea virus teaching for farmers.

Abstract

Bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) is a costly disease and its eradication is the focus of the English voluntary scheme, BVDFree. The process of identifying a farm as negative or not negative is broken down into four stages using ADAM: assess disease risk; define herd status; action plan for BVD control; monitor progress. This process is based on the long-established protocols defined by Cattle Health Certification Standards. The first two stages are discussed in this article with the others following in part 2 of this series.

The risk assessment for current infection should focus on incoming animals to the herd, boundary fences and existing vaccination programmes. Suitable testing can then follow with a choice of newborn screening or youngstock cohort surveillance, with optional bulk milk analysis in dairy herds. Farms that show initial evidence of endemic BVDV infection can undertake further testing to discover the source.

Bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) is a common virus of cattle subject to compulsory eradication schemes in many countries, including Scotland and Ireland. Estimated to cost the UK cattle industry £25–61 million pounds annually, it is the most costly single-agent infectious disease (Bennett, 2003). This is because of its rapid spread within the herd, production losses (particularly due to its impact on fertility) and induction of immunosuppression increasing incidence of other diseases (calf scour, respiratory disease, mastitis, lameness, infertility) (Evans et al, 2019). For more detail on the economic impact of BVDV, the reader is referred to the systematic review by Yarnall and Thrusfield (2017).

The primary source of the virus is a calf born persistently in-fected (PI) with BVDV (PI calf). They are tolerised to the virus in utero, and produce virus throughout life, in all body secretions. PI calves can die young, but one third of them may survive longer than 2 years (Booth and Brownlie, 2012), and enter into the breeding herd. PI calves are produced when a naïve dam is infected for the first time before 125 days of pregnancy.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.