References

Adkins PRF, Middleton JR, Fox LK, Third edition. In: Middleton JR, Fox LF, Pighetti G, Petersson-Wolfe C (eds). New Prague: National Mastitis Council; 2017

Adkins PRF, Middleton JR Methods for Diagnosing Mastitis.. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2018; 34:(3)479-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2018.07.003

Arcangioli MA, Chazel M, Sellal E Prevalence of Mycoplasma bovis udder infection in dairy cattle: preliminary field investigation in southeast France.. N Z Vet J. 2011; 59:(2)75-8 https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2011.552856

Biddle MK, Fox LK, Hancock DD Patterns of mycoplasma shedding in the milk of dairy cows with intramammary mycoplasma infection.. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003; 223:(8)1163-1166 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2003.223.1163

Boonyayatra S, Fox LK, Besser TE, Sawant A, Gay JM Effects of storage methods on the recovery of Mycoplasma species from milk samples.. Vet Microbiol. 2010; 144:(1-2)210-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.014

Boonyayatra S, Fox LK, Besser TE, Sawant A, Gay JM, Raviv Z A PCR assay and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism combination identifying the 3 primary Mycoplasma species causing mastitis.. J Dairy Sci. 2012; 95:(1)196-205 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4531

Britten AM The role of diagnostic microbiology in mastitis control programs.. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2012; 28:(2)187-202 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2012.03.006

Cai HY, Bell-Rogers P, Parker L, Prescott JF Development of a real-time PCR for detection of Mycoplasma bovis in bovine milk and lung samples.. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2005; 17:(6)537-45 https://doi.org/10.1177/104063870501700603

Divers TJ, Peek SF Rebhun's Diseases of Dairy Cattle., 2nd Edition. : Elsevier; 2007

Fox LK Mycoplasma Mastitis.. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2012; 28:(2)225-37 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2012.03.007

Hazelton MS, Sheehy PA, Bosward KL Short communication: shedding of Mycoplasma bovis and antibody responses in cows recently diagnosed with clinical infection.. J Dairy Sci. 2018; 101:(1)584-9 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13512

Justice-Allen A, Trujillo J, Goodell G, Wilson D Detection of multiple Mycoplasma species in bulk tank milk samples using real-time PCR and conventional culture and comparison of test sensitivities.. J Dairy Sci. 2011; 94:(7)3411-19 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3940

Leimbach S, Krömker V Laboratory evaluation of a novel rapid tube test system for differentiation of mastitis-causing pathogen groups.. J Dairy Sci. 2018; 101:(7)6357-65 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-14198

McAuliffe L, Ellis RJ, Ayling RD, Nicholas RAJ Differentiation of Mycoplasma species by 16S ribosomal DNA PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis fingerprinting.. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41:(10)4844-7 https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.10.4844-4847.2003

Nicholas RAJ, Ayling RD Mycoplasma bovis: disease, diagnosis, and control.. Res Vet Sci. 2003; 74:(2)105-12 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-5288(02)00155-8

Nielsen PK, Petersen MB, Nielsen LR, Halasa T, Toft N Latent class analysis of bulk tank milk PCR and ELISA testing for herd level diagnosis of Mycoplasma bovis.. Prev Vet Med. 2015; 121:(3-4)338-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.08.009

Parker AM, House JK, Hazelton MS, Bosward KL, Morton JM, Sheehy PA Bulk tank milk antibody ELISA as a biosecurity tool for detecting dairy herds with past exposure to Mycoplasma bovis.. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100:(10)8296-309 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12468

Parker AM, Sheehy PA, Hazelton MS, Bosward KL, House JK A review of mycoplasma diagnostics in cattle.. J Vet Intern Med. 2018; 32:(3)1241-52 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15135

Passchyn P, Piepers S, De Meulemeester L, Boyen F, Haesebrouck F, De Vliegher S Between-herd prevalence of Mycoplasma bovis in bulk milk in Flanders, Belgium.. Res Vet Sci. 2012; 92:(2)219-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.03.016

Petersen MB, Pedersen J, Holm DL, Denwood M, Nielsen LR A longitudinal observational study of the dynamics of Mycoplasma bovis antibodies in naturally exposed and diseased dairy cows.. J Dairy Sci. 2018; 101:(8)7383-96 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-14340

Pinho L, Thompson G, Machado M, Carvalheira J Management practices associated with the bulk tank milk prevalence of Mycoplasma spp. in dairy herds in Northwestern Portugal.. Prev Vet Med. 2013; 108:(1)21-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevet-med.2012.07.001

Rossetti BC, Frey J, Pilo P Direct detection of Mycoplasma bovis in milk and tissue samples by real-time PCR.. Molecular and Cellular Probes. 2010; 24:(5)321-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2010.05.001

Ruhnke HL, Thawley D, Nelson FC Bovine mastitis in Ontario due to Mycoplasma agalactiae subsp. bovis.. Can J Comp Med. 1976; 40:(2)142-8

Diagnosis and treatment of Mycoplasma bovis mastitis (MbM) in dairy cows.. 1985. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3914735

Wawegama NK, Browning GF, Kanci A, Marenda MS, Markham PF Development of a recombinant protein-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of mycoplasma bovis infection in cattle.. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014; 21:(2)196-202 https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00670-13

Mycoplasma spp. mastitis — approach to diagnosis

02 July 2020
6 mins read
Volume 25 · Issue 4
Figure 1. The characteristic oily appearance of Mycoplasma bovis on selective growth media.
Figure 1. The characteristic oily appearance of Mycoplasma bovis on selective growth media.

Abstract

Mycoplasma spp. mastitis outbreaks are rare, but when they occur they tend to be characterised by recurrent mastitis that is non-responsive to treatment, and a high rate of subclinical infections. These symptoms are often seen in conjunction with chronic calf pneumonia, and polyarthritis. General screening of individual cows or bulk tanks for Mycoplasma spp. is likely to result in more false positives than true positives, whichever test is chosen. Instead of using screening tests, veterinary surgeons should use targeted investigations on farms that meet the criteria of a suspected Mycoplasma spp. outbreak. For investigating individual animals, the most accurate test is likely to be bacteriological culture using selective growth media. For investigating bulk tanks, Mycoplasma bov is antibody testing is most sensitive but should be complemented with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or culture to detect other species. Diagnostic sensitivity is increased by repeating or using a combination of tests, however this will increase the risk of false positives.

According to Vandeplassche, diagnosis of Mycoplasma spp. mastitis ‘usually comes too late’ (Vandeplassche, 1985). Once infected, Mycoplasma spp. are not sensitive to licensed treatments and cows can take months to years to self-cure (Ruhnke et al, 1976). During this time infected cows can shed Mycoplasma spp. in high numbers, and pose a contagious risk to other cows during the milking process (Divers and Peek, 2007). The most frequently reported symptom is recurrent mastitis that is non-responsive to treatment, however the other indicators of a Mycoplasma spp. outbreak are listed in Box 1.

Box 1.Criteria of Mycoplasma spp. mastitis outbreaks

Most outbreaks are associated with Mycoplasma bovis, however several other species have been isolated from bovine mastitis including Mycoplasma arginini, Mycoplasma bovirhinis, Mycoplasma californicum, Mycoplasma canadense, Mycoplasma dispar (Fox, 2012). Veterinary surgeons should consider this when choosing a diagnostic approach, as tests that are specific for M. bovis will not detect these other species.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.