References
On-farm culture and pathogen identification: risks and benefits
Abstract
Selective treatment of clinical mastitis cases based on the results of on-farm culture (OFC) has been suggested by several international experts. It is based on the theory that mastitis cases caused by Gram-negative species has high resolution rates, and those that do not resolve respond poorly to therapy. Several peer-reviewed studies have evaluated the accuracy of different OFC test kits, which are between 60–85% accurate at identifying Gram-positive pathogens. Implementation studies consistently show a reduction in antimicrobial use, although further research across larger populations is needed to assess the impact on mastitis cure. Any OFC protocol should be regularly reviewed with the herd veterinarian. Herds with a high bulk cell count, a high prevalence of Gram-positive pathogens (e.g. Streptococcus uberis), or with a high prevalence of Klebsiella spp. should carefully consider the impact of deferred or withholding treatment on mastitis cure.
On-farm culture (OFC) is based on the theory that clinical mastitis caused by Gram-negative pathogens does not require antimicrobial treatment. In OFC protocols, cows with mastitis have an aseptic milk sample taken, which is incubated on agar or in broth. Antimicrobial treatment is withheld in samples with pure growth of Gramnegative species, or no significant growth. In samples with Grampositive species, mixed or contaminated growth, intramammary antimicrobial treatment is given on label.
Several OFC studies have shown that withholding treatment in cases of mastitis caused by Escherichia coli has no detectable impact on treatment outcome (Lago et al, 2011; Vasquez et al, 2017; Fuenzalida and Ruegg, 2019; Schmenger et al, 2020). One criticism of these studies is that they lack statistical power to detect a meaningful clinical difference in cure rate, i.e. the sample size is too small. Two independent studies in the USA have shown a 10–11% numerical reduction in bacteriological cure risk, which was not ‘statistically significant’ (Lago et al, 2011; Fuenzalida and Ruegg, 2019). A recent study in Germany showed more convincing evidence that bacteriological cure rate is unaffected by OFC: 75.3% with conventional therapy compared with 78.4% in the OFC group (Schmenger et al, 2020). Another USA study found similar days to clinical cure, although bacteriological cure was not assessed (Vasquez et al, 2017).
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.