References

Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB). Youngstock and heifers. Dairy housing: a best practice guide. 2015. https://ahdb.org.uk/knowledge-library/dairy-housing-youngstock-and-heifers (accessed 22 April 2022)

Anderson JF, Bates DW. Influence of improved ventilation on health of confined cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1979; 174:(6)577-580

Anon. Average Humidity in the United Kingdom - Current Results. https://www.currentresults.com/Weather/United-Kingdom/humidity-annual.php

Babu LK, Pandey HN, Sahoo A. Effect of individual versus group rearing on ethological and physiological responses of crossbred calves. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2004; 87:(3-4)177-191 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.01.006

Barrington GM, Gay JM, Evermann JF. Biosecurity for neonatal gastrointestinal diseases. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2002; 18:(1)7-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0720(02)00005-1

Calculation of ventilation needs for confined cattle. 1979. https://europepmc.org/article/med/422460

Callan RJ, Garry FB. Biosecurity and bovine respiratory disease. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2002; 18:(1)57-77 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0720(02)00004-X

Cantor MC, Costa JHC. Daily behavioral measures recorded by precision technology devices may indicate bovine respiratory disease status in preweaned dairy calves. J Dairy Sci. 2022; S0022-0302(22)00139-4 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-20798

Chua B, Coenen E, Van Delen J, Weary DM. Effects of pair versus individual housing on the behavior and performance of dairy calves. In J. Dairy Sci. 2002a; 85:(2)360-364 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74082-4

Conboy MH, Winder CH, Cantor MC Associations between feeding behaviors collected from an automated milk feeder and neonatal calf diarrhea in group housed dairy calves: a case-control study. Animals. 2022; 12:(2) https://doi.org/10.3390/ANI12020170

Costa JHC, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. Invited review: effects of group housing of dairy calves on behavior, cognition, performance, and health. J Dairy Sci. 2016; 99:(4)2453-2467 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10144

Curtis SE. Air environment and animal performance. J Anim Sci. 1972; 35:(3)628-634 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1972.353628x

De Paula Vieira A, von Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. Effects of pair versus single housing on performance and behavior of dairy calves before and after weaning from milk. J Dairy Sci. 2010; 93:(7)3079-3085 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2516

Hill TM, Bateman HG, Aldrich JM, Schlotterbeck RL. Comparisons of housing, bedding, and cooling options for dairy calves. J Dairy Sci. 2011; 94:(4)2138-2146 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3841

Hyde RM, Green MJ, Sherwin VE Quantitative analysis of calf mortality in Great Britain. J Dairy Sci. 2020; 103:(3)2615-2623 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17383

Jensen MB, Larsen LE. Effects of level of social contact on dairy calf behavior and health. J Dairy Sci. 2014; 97:(8)5035-5044 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7311

Johnson KF, Chancellor N, Burn CC, Wathes DC. Prospective cohort study to assess rates of contagious disease in pre-weaned UK dairy heifers: management practices, passive transfer of immunity and associated calf health. Vet Rec Open. 2017; 4:(1) https://doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2017-000226

Jorgensen MW, Adams-Progar A, de Passillé AM Factors associated with dairy calf health in automated feeding systems in the Upper Midwest United States. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100:(7)5675-5686 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12501

Keeling LJ, Hurnik JF. Social facilitation and synchronization of eating between familiar and unfamiliar newly weaned piglets. Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci. 1996; 46:(1)54-60 https://doi.org/10.1080/09064709609410924

Knauer WA, Godden SM, Dietrich A, Hawkins DM, James RE. Evaluation of applying statistical process control techniques to daily average feeding behaviors to detect disease in automatically fed group-housed preweaned dairy calves. J Dairy Sci. 2018; 101:(9)8135-8145 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13947

Lago A, McGuirk SM, Bennett TB, Cook NB, Nordlund KV. Calf respiratory disease and pen microenvironments in naturally ventilated calf barns in winter. J Dairy Sci. 2006; 89:(10)4014-4025 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72445-6

Louie AP, Rowe JD, Love WJ, Lehenbauer TW, Aly SS. Effect of the environment on the risk of respiratory disease in preweaning dairy calves during summer months. J Dairy Sci. 2018; 101:(11)10230-10247 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13716

Mahendran SA, Wathes DC, Booth RE, Blackie N. The Health and Behavioural Effects of Individual versus Pair Housing of Calves at Different Ages on a UK Commercial Dairy Farm. Animals. 2021; 11:(3) https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030612

Mahendran SA, Wathes DC, Booth RE, Blackie N. A survey of calf management practices and farmer perceptions of calf housing in UK dairy herds. J Dairy Sci. 2022; 105:(1)409-423 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2021-20638

Marcé C, Guatteo R, Bareille N, Fourichon C. Dairy calf housing systems across Europe and risk for calf infectious diseases. Animal. 2010; 4:(9)1588-1596 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731110000650

Medrano-Galarza C, LeBlanc SJ, Jones-Bitton A Associations between management practices and within-pen prevalence of calf diarrhea and respiratory disease on dairy farms using automated milk feeders. J Dairy Sci. 2018; 101:(3)2293-2308 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13733

Mitchell CD. Calf Housing Handbook.: Scottish Farm Buildings Investigation Unit; 1976

Pálka V, Šoch M, Šťastná J Comparison of Micro-climate conditions of various calf housing systems. Lucr Stiint Zooteh Biotehnol. 2011; 44:(11)501-503

Parker W. Housing of ruminants. II. Requirements of good housing and effects of bad housing. Vet Rec. 1968; 83:(15)364-368 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.83.15.364

Reiten M, Rousing T, Thomsen PT, Sørensen JT. Short communication: are group size and pasteurization of whole milk associated with diarrhea and growth of pre-weaned organic dairy calves?. Res Vet Sci. 2019; 123:32-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.11.021

Rushen J, de Passillé AM. The motivation of non-nutritive sucking in calves, Bos taurus. Anim Behav. 1995; 49:(6)1503-1510 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(95)90071-3

Spinka M, Newberry RC, Bekoff M. Mammalian play: training for the unexpected. Q Rev Biol. 2001; 76:(2)141-68 https://doi.org/10.1086/393866

Veissier I, de Passillé AM, Després G Does nutritive and non-nutritive sucking reduce other oral behaviors and stimulate rest in calves?. J Anim Sci. 2002; 80:(10)2574-2587

Waltner-Toews D, Martin SW, Meek AH. Dairy calf management, morbidity and mortality in Ontario Holstein herds. III. Association of management with morbidity. Prev Vet Med. 1986; 4:(2)137-158 https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(86)90019-X

Webster AJF. Problems of feeding and housing: their diagnosis and control. Livestock Health and Welfare. 1992; 293-333

Wormsbecher L, Bergeron R, Haley D, de Passillé AM, Rushen J, Vasseur E. A method of outdoor housing dairy calves in pairs using individual calf hutches. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100:(9)7493-7506 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12559

Practical implications of calf housing systems in the UK

02 May 2022
10 mins read
Volume 27 · Issue 3
Figure 2. Small groups of calves housed within a polytunnel, fed using manual Wydale feeders.
Figure 2. Small groups of calves housed within a polytunnel, fed using manual Wydale feeders.

Abstract

One of the biggest environmental and management factors that impact calf health and welfare is the housing within which they are kept, particularly in the first few months of life. There are multiple housing systems used on farms in the UK, each providing its own challenges, with the additional pressure of changing weather systems adding to the difficulties faced in the calf housing across the changing seasons. Temperature and humidity levels can have a direct impact on disease pressures, so knowing how calf housing responds in the summer and winter can help manage these pressures. There has been an overall reduction in individual calf housing used in the UK, although there is still a perception that individual housing results in better calf health. There is mounting evidence to support the positive benefits of pair housing of calves on growth rates and solid feed intakes, and an uptake of computerised calf feeders can help to monitor large group sizes for signs of ill health.

With the rise in input costs putting ever higher pressures on profit margins, the end goal of successful calf rearing, to ensure a healthy and profitable animal that is reared in a time and resource efficient manner, has never been more important. Calf mortality remains high in the UK, with reports of 4.5% (Johnson et al, 2017) in dairy calves in the first 2 months of life, and a further 6.0% of dairy calves dying within 3 months of birth (Hyde et al, 2020). Calf housing has one of the biggest environmental and management impacts on health and welfare, and this will be explored here in this article.

There are multiple housing systems currently used to house and manage pre-weaning dairy calves on farms in the UK. These include a mixture of individual and group hutches, indoor pre-fabricated partition pens (Figure 1) or larger group pens within buildings (Figure 2), and outdoor pasture-based rearing systems. The cost of different housing systems varies widely, with individual calf hutches costing £200–400 each, group hutches for 10 calves costing £3000–8000 each depending on the make, and a shed for housing calves ~£80 000 depending on the size required. This should be borne in mind when advising farmers to change their calf housing type, as initial outlays may be considerable in larger farms.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.