References

Agger JF, Christoffersen AB, Rattenborg E, Nielsen J, Agerholm JS. Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii antibodies in Danish dairy herds. Acta Vet Scand. 2010; 52:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-52-5

Animal and Plant Health Agency. Zoonoses and Veterinary Public Health. Annual Report 2022. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1137621/Zoonoses_Annual_Report_2022.pdf (accessed 24 April 2023)

Astobiza I, Barandika JF, Juste RA, Hurtado A, García-Pérez AL. Evaluation of the efficacy of oxytetracycline treatment followed by vaccination against Q fever in a highly infected sheep flock. Vet J. 2013; 196:(1)81-85 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.07.028

Barberio A, Ceglie L, Lucchese L, Zuliani F. Epidemiology of Q fever in cattle. In: Caetano Simões JC, Ferreira Anastácio S, Jorge da Silva G (eds). New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2017

Behymer DE, Biberstein EL, Riemann HP, Franti CE, Sawyer M. Q fever (Coxiella burnetii) investigations in dairy cattle: persistence of antibodies after vaccination. Am J Vet Res. 1975; 36:(6)781-784

Brom RV, Engelen E, Roest HIJ, Hoek W, Vellema P. Coxiella burnetii infections in sheep or goats: an opinionated review. Vet Microbiol. 2015; 181:(1-2)119-129 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.07.011

Cabell E. Bovine abortion: aetiology and investigations. In Pract. 2007; 29:(8)455-463 https://doi.org/10.1136/inpract.29.8.455

Cabrera VE. Economics of fertility in high-yielding dairy cows on confined TMR systems. Animal. 2014; 8:211-221 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000512

Capuano F, Landolfi MC, Monetti DM. Influence of three types of farm management on the seroprevalence of Q fever as assessed by an indirect immunofluorescence assay. Vet Rec. 2001; 149:(22)669-671 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.149.22.669

Clark NJ, Soares Magalhães RJ. Airborne geographical dispersal of Q fever from livestock holdings to human communities: a systematic review and critical appraisal of evidence. BMC Infect Dis. 2018; 18:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3135-4

Commandeur M, Jeurissen L, van der Hoek W, Roest HJ, Hermans TCML. Spatial relationships in the Q fever outbreaks 2007–2010 in the Netherlands. Int J Environ Health Res. 2014; 24:(2)137-157 https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2013.800963

Courcoul A, Hogerwerf L, Klinkenberg D, Nielen M, Vergu E, Beaudeau F. Modelling effectiveness of herd level vaccination against Q fever in dairy cattle. Vet Res. 2011; 42:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9716-42-68

Dobos A, Gábor G, Wehmann E Serological screening for Coxiella burnetii in the context of early pregnancy loss in dairy cows. Acta Vet Hung. 2020; 68:(3)305-309 https://doi.org/10.1556/004.2020.00035

Eastwood K, Graves SR, Massey PD, Bosward K, van den Berg D, Hutchinson P. Q fever: A rural disease with potential urban consequences. Aust J Gen Pract. 2018; 47:(3) https://doi.org/10.31128/AFP-08-17-4299

Gale P, Adkin A, Drew T, Wooldridge M. Predicting the impact of climate change on livestock disease in Great Britain. Vet Rec. 2008; 162:(7)214-215 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.162.7.214

Gale P, Drew T, Phipps LP, David G, Wooldridge M. The effect of climate change on the occurrence and prevalence of livestock diseases in Great Britain: a review. J Appl Microbiol. 2009; 106:(5)1409-1423 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04036.x

Garforth C, Rehman T, McKerney K Improving the design of knowledge transfer strategies by understanding farmer attitudes and behaviour. J Farm Manag. 2004; 12:17-32

Climate and livestock disease: assessing the vulnerability of agricultural systems to livestock pests under climate change scenarios. CCAFS Working Paper no. 116. Copenhagen, Denmark. 2015. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/65224 (accessed 24 April 2023)

Hawker JI, Ayres JG, Blair I A large outbreak of Q fever in the West Midlands: windborne spread into a metropolitan area?. Commun Dis Public Health. 1998; 1:(3)180-187

Hermans T, Jeurissen L, Hackert V, Hoebe C. Land-applied goat manure as a source of human Q-fever in the Netherlands, 2006-2010. PLoS One. 2014; 9:(5) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096607

López-Helguera I, López-Gatius F, Tutusaus J, Garcia-Ispierto I. Reproductive performance of high producing lactating cows in Coxiella-infected herds following vaccination with phase-I Coxiella burnetii vaccine during advanced pregnancy. Vaccine. 2013; 31:(30)3046-3050 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.067

Maurin M, Raoult D. Q fever. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999; 12:(4)518-553 https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.12.4.518

Impact de la vaccination et de l'antibiothérapie sur l'incidence des troubles de la reproduction et sur la fertilité dans des troupeaux bovins laitiers infectés par Coxiella burnetii. 2012. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=FR20210202426 (accessed 24 April 2023)

Plummer PJ, McClure JT, Menzies P, Morley PS, Van den Brom R, Van Metre DC. Management of Coxiella burnetii infection in livestock populations and the associated zoonotic risk: A consensus statement. J Vet Intern Med. 2018; 32:(5)1481-1494 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15229

Rodolakis A, Berri M, Héchard C Comparison of Coxiella burnetii shedding in milk of dairy bovine, caprine, and ovine herds. J Dairy Sci. 2007; 90:(12)5352-5360 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-815

Sheldon IM, Williams EJ, Miller ANA, Nash DM, Herath S. Uterine diseases in cattle after parturition. Vet J. 2008; 176:(1)115-121 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.12.031

Statham JME. Cattle Health Schemes: 1. Single-agent infectious diseases. InPractice. 2011a; 33:(5)210-217 https://doi.org/10.1136/inp.d2875

Statham JME. Cattle Health Schemes: 2. Multifactorial or management diseases. InPractice. 2011b; 33:(6)282-285 https://doi.org/10.1136/inp.d3600

Statham JME. Encouraging active health planning. Vet Rec. 2012; 170:(17)439-440 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.e2984

Statham JME, Green M, Husband J, Huxley JN. Climate change & cattle farming. InPractice. 2017; 39:10-19

Statham JME, Burton K, Spilman MW. Looking after the bull. InPract. 2019;

Taurel AF, Guatteo R, Joly A, Beaudeau F. Effectiveness of vaccination and antibiotics to control Coxiella burnetii shedding around calving in dairy cows. Vet Microbiol. 2012; 159:(3-4)432-437 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.04.027

Treilles M, Charollais P, Guatteo R QTest: A new way to easily sample, store, and ship samples to perform Q fever PCR analysis on bulk tank milk. JDS Communications. 2021; 2:(6)409-414 https://doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2021-0144

Valergakis GE, Russell C, Grogono-Thomas R, Bradley AJ, Eisler MC. Coxiella burnetii in bulk tank milk of dairy cattle in south-west England. Vet Rec. 2012; 171:(6)156,1-2 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.100908

Valla G. Prevalenza di Coxiella burnetii nel latte di massa in allevamenti di bovine da latte italiani e possibile correlazione con problemi riproduttivi. Large Anim Rev. 2014; 20:51-56

Velasova M, Damaso A, Prakashbabu BC Herd-level prevalence of selected endemic infectious diseases of dairy cows in Great Britain. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100:(11)9215-9233 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11863

Wouda W, Dercksen DP. Abortion and stillbirth among dairy goats as a consequence of Coxiella burnetii. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 2007; 132:(23)908-911

Q fever: a disease with underappreciated significance?

02 May 2023
12 mins read
Volume 28 · Issue 3
Figure 1. Freshly calved cow and environment
Figure 1. Freshly calved cow and environment

Abstract

Q fever is a zoonotic disease caused by Coxiella burnetii, a bacterium found worldwide in a wide range of animals. The term ‘Q fever’ (for query fever) was proposed in 1937 by Edward Holbrook Derrick to describe febrile illnesses in abattoir workers in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. In ruminants, the infection may cause abortions, infertility, metritis or chronic mastitis, which can lead to economic losses for the infected herds and impacts sustainability. Since 2007, Q fever has been emerging as a public health problem in several parts of Europe, as well as further afield. Although Q fever is asymptomatic in 60% of human cases, it can lead to acute or chronic infections and cause flu-like syndrome, hepatitis, pneumonia, endocarditis or abortions. Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) was made reportable in UK under the Zoonoses Order in 2021.

Q fever prevalence and significance are potentially underappreciated in the UK and other countries such as France, Italy and Germany. Although its impact should generally be regarded appropriately as lower than acknowledged major infectious causes of ruminant infertility such as bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDv) or bovine herpesvirus-1 (BoHV-1), it may not be recognised as significant at all because of poor disease surveillance. Velasova et al (2017) reviewed the herd-level prevalence of selected endemic infectious diseases of dairy cows in Great Britain and although approaching 80% of surveyed herds were seropositive for Coxiella burnetii, only 1–2% of farmers believed that the disease was present on their farm and 0% perceived that the disease was a problem.

Q fever is a zoonotic disease caused by C. burnetii, a bacterium found worldwide in a wide range of animals. The term ‘Q fever’ (for query fever) was proposed in 1937 by Edward Holbrook Derrick to describe febrile illnesses in abattoir workers in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, where it remains a zoonosis of significance. Since 2007, Q fever has been emerging as a public health problem in several parts of Europe, with a high profile outbreak in the Netherlands (Hermans et al, 2014), as well as increased recognition as a consequence of more robust screening. Although Q fever is asymptomatic in 60% of human cases, it can lead to acute or chronic infections and cause a flu-like syndrome, hepatitis, pneumonia, endocarditis or abortions. In ruminants, C. burnetii may be the cause of abortions, infertility, metritis or chronic mastitis for the infected herds. However, how well recognised is this risk of economic losses and reduced sustainability of production (Cabrera, 2014)? Diagnosis of infertility, including pregnancy loss in cattle and other ruminants, is complex. The diagnostic rate achieved for abortions is generally low, averaging at about 35% of cases where a foetus and placenta are submitted for an abortion investigation; in cattle, there is frequently a delay between fetal death and expulsion (Cabell, 2007). The need for disease mitigation, including reproductive losses, is recognised as an important part of an approach to sustainable herd health (Statham et al, 2017).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.