References

Adams AL, Kristula M, Hain MV. Dairy cattle handling Extension programs: training workers and cattle. J Ext. 2019; 57:(4)

Boivin X, Lensink J, Tallet C, Veissier I. Stockmanship and farm animal welfare. Anim Welf. 2003; 12:(4)479-492

Brajon S, Laforest JP, Bergeron R, Tallet C, Hötzel MJ, Devillers N. Persistency of the piglet's reactivity to the handler following a previous positive or negative experience. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2015; 162:9-19 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.11.009

Breuer K, Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Matthews LR, Coleman GJ. Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2000; 66:(4)273-288 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00097-0

Burton RJF, Peoples S, Cooper MH. Building ‘cowshed cultures’: A cultural perspective on the promotion of stockmanship and animal welfare on dairy farms. J Rural Stud. 2012; 28:(2)174-187 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.12.003

Ceballos MC, Sant'Anna AC, Boivin X, Costa FO, Carvalhal MVL, Paranhos da Costa MJR. Impact of good practices of handling training on beef cattle welfare and stockpeople attitudes and behaviors. Livest Sci. 2018; 216:(June)24-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.06.019

Coleman G, Hemsworth PH. Training to improve stockperson beliefs and behaviour towards livestock enhances welfare and productivity. Rev Sci Tech. 2014; 33:(1)131-137 https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.33.1.2257

Coulon M, Nowak R, Peyrat J, Chandèze H, Boissy A, Boivin X. Do lambs perceive regular human stroking as pleasant? Behavior and heart rate variability analyses. PLoS One. 2015; 10:(2) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118617

Daigle CL, Ridge EE. Investing in stockpeople is an investment in animal welfare and agricultural sustainability. Anim Front. 2018; 8:(3)53-59 https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfy015

de Oliveira D, Paranhos da Costa MJR, Zupan M, Rehn T, Keeling LJ. Early human handling in non-weaned piglets: effects on behaviour and body weight. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2015; 164:56-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.01.002

de Passillé AMB, Rushen J. Are you a source of stress or comfort for your cows?. Adv Dairy Technol. 1999; 1999:(11)347-360

des Roches AB, Veissier I, Boivin X, Gilot-Fromont E, Mounier L. A prospective exploration of farm, farmer, and animal characteristics in human-animal relationships: an epidemiological survey. J Dairy Sci. 2016; 99:(7)5573-5585 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10633

Fukasawa M, Kawahata M, Higashiyama Y, Komatsu T. Relationship between the stockperson's attitudes and dairy productivity in Japan. Anim Sci J. 2017; 88:(2)394-400 https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12652

Grandin T, Shivley C. How farm animals react and perceive stressful situations such as handling, restraint, and transport. Animals (Basel). 2015; 5:(4)1233-1251 https://doi.org/10.3390/ani5040409

Safe handling of large animals. 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/10464/7184

Hemsworth PH. Human–animal interactions in livestock production. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2003; 81:(3)185-198 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00280-0

Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ. Human-livestock interactions: The stockperson and the productivity of intensively farmed animals.Wallingford: CABI; 2010

Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ. Human-livestock interactions: the stockperson and the productivity and welfare of intensively farmed animals, 2nd edn. Wallingford: CABI; 2011

Ivemeyer S, Simantke C, Ebinghaus A Herd-level associations between human–animal relationship, management, fecal cortisol metabolites, and udder health of organic dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2018; 101:(8)7361-7374 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13912

Kielland C, Skjerve E, Østerås O, Zanella AJ. Dairy farmer attitudes and empathy toward animals are associated with animal welfare indicators. J Dairy Sci. 2010; 93:(7)2998-3006 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2899

Kumar B, Manuja A, Aich P. Stress and its impact on farm animals. Front Biosci - Elit. 2012; 4 E:(5)1759-67 https://doi.org/10.2741/e496

Leon AF, Sanchez JA, Romero MH. Association between attitude and empathy with the quality of human-livestock interactions. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10:(8) https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081304

Lindahl C, Pinzke S, Herlin A, Keeling LJ. Human-animal interactions and safety during dairy cattle handling—comparing moving cows to milking and hoof trimming. J Dairy Sci. 2016; 99:(3)2131-2141 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-9210

Mota-Rojas D, Broom DM, Orihuela A, Velarde A, Napolitano F, Alonso-Spilsbury M. Effects of human-animal relationship on animal productivity and welfare. J Anim Behav Biometeorol. 2020; 8:(3)196-205 https://doi.org/10.31893/jabb.20026

Muns R, Rault JL, Hemsworth P. Positive human contact on the first day of life alters the piglet's behavioural response to humans and husbandry practices. Physiol Behav. 2015; 151:162-167 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.06.030

Nawroth C, Albuquerque N, Savalli C, Single MS, McElligott AG. Goats prefer positive human emotional facial expressions. R Soc Open Sci. 2018; 5:(8) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180491

Pol F, Kling-Eveillard F, Champigneulle F, Fresnay E, Ducrocq M, Courboulay V. Human–animal relationship influences husbandry practices, animal welfare and productivity in pig farming. Animal. 2021; 15:(2) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2020.100103

Rault JL, Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Hemsworth P. The power of a positive human–animal relationship for animal welfare. Front Vet Sci. 2020; 7 https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.590867

Rushen J, Taylor AA, de Passillé AM. Domestic animals' fear of humans and its effect on their welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1999a; 65:(3)285-303 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00089-1

Rushen J, de Passillé AMB, Munksgaard L. Fear of people by cows and effects on milk yield, behavior, and heart rate at milking. J Dairy Sci. 1999b; 82:(4)720-727 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75289-6

Rybarczyk P, Koba Y, Rushen J, Tanida H, de Passillé AM. Can cows discriminate people by their faces?. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2001; 74:(3)175-189 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00162-9

Schmied C, Boivin X, Waiblinger S. Stroking different body regions of dairy cows: effects on avoidance and approach behavior toward humans. J Dairy Sci. 2008; 91:(2)596-605 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0360

Tallet C, Sy K, Prunier A, Nowak R, Boissy A, Boivin X. Behavioural and physiological reactions of piglets to gentle tactile interactions vary according to their previous experience with humans. Livest Sci. 2014; 167:(1)331-341 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.06.025

Titterington FM, Knox R, Buijs S, Lowe DE, Morrison SJ, Lively FO, Shirali M. Human–animal interactions with Bos taurus cattle and their impacts on on-farm safety: a systematic review. Animals (Basel). 2022; 12:(6) https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12060776

Waiblinger S, Boivin X, Pedersen V, Tosi MV, Janczak AM, Visser EK, Jones RB. Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: a critical review. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2006; 101:(3-4)185-242 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001

Waynert DF, Stookey JM, Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, Watts JM, Waltz CS. The response of beef cattle to noise during handling. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1999; 62:(1)27-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00211-1

Westerath HS, Gygax L, Hillmann E. Are special feed and being brushed judged as positive by calves?. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2014; 156:12-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.04.003

Zulkifli I. Review of human-animal interactions and their impact on animal productivity and welfare. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2013; 4:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-4-25

The importance of the human–animal relationship for commercial farms

02 January 2023
8 mins read
Volume 28 · Issue 1
Figure 3. Increasing contact during rearing improves relationships.
Figure 3. Increasing contact during rearing improves relationships.

Abstract

The human–animal relationship is a key aspect of managing livestock. Poor stockmanship may lead to negative implications for the health, welfare and productivity of farm animals and could lead to poor job satisfaction for the stockperson. It can also make it potentially difficult for veterinarians and farmers to treat livestock because an animal may associate humans with negative experiences. This review summarises research based on human–animal interactions, discusses its implications for the health and welfare of livestock, and provides suggestions for improving relationships between humans and farm animals.

Humans have managed livestock for millennia, and this relationship with animals has evolved over time. In the modern world, awareness of welfare implications has increased, and the role of the stockperson is thought to be key (Coleman and Hemsworth, 2014). Applying techniques to manage livestock in a positive way can potentially improve their health, welfare and productivity by reducing fear and stress (Hemsworth, 2003; Hemsworth and Coleman, 2011). Therefore, it is important that those who interact with livestock are aware of their influence on animal behaviour and how changing their attitude and behaviour may improve relationships. It is also important that appropriate training is provided to encourage this (Coleman and Hemsworth, 2014; Ceballos et al, 2018), and the effect of poor stockmanship on other parties, such as veterinarians, should also be considered. This review discusses the implications of both positive and poor relationships between stockpeople and the farm animals under their care, and suggests how poor relationships can be improved upon.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting UK-VET Companion Animal and reading some of our peer-reviewed content for veterinary professionals. To continue reading this article, please register today.